We require complete separation from Law Society to police money laundering, SRA tells Treasury

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has opened a 2nd front in its campaign for complete separation from the Law Society by appealing to the Treasury to intervene over the concern of money laundering.

The SRA said that instead of putting in location safeguards to make sure enough separation in between regulation and representation in anti-money laundering (AML) supervision, the Treasury ought to impose actual separation.


In its reaction to a call for details from the Treasury on strategies to shock the AML supervisory regime, the SRA went on: AML supervisors must be independent from interference or control from any representative body operating on behalf of the profession.

Without different bodies for representation and policy, we do not believe that there can be totally efficient AML guidance. Public self-confidence is vital and it is important that vested interests are unable to, or are perceived as being able to, impact governing activities in this extremely important area.

Consumers have greater trust in specialists who are controlled by an independent regulative body, rather than by the occupation itself.

Reacting to the Treasury’s question on whether the federal government should mandate the separation of representative and AML supervisory functions, the SRA s response was yes.

The Ministry of Justice is anticipated to release a consultation on the problem of separating legal regulators from their representative bodies after the EU referendum.

The SRA also utilized the consultation response to renew its calls for robust fining powers and a civil requirement of proof.


The regulator grumbled, as it has formerly, that section 44D of the Solicitors Act restricted its internal fining powers for solicitors and standard law firms to 2,000, compared with the fine of as much as 250m it could impose on an alternative company structure under the Legal Services Act.

Swifter settlement by the SRA without tribunal involvement would reduce the overall regulatory burden, benefitting all managed companies. This would also reduce delay, uncertainty and cost from those dealing with the corrective process and would support quick, reasonable and firm governing action.

In addition to the need to increase the SRA’s fining powers, we believe that there need to be consistency of fining powers throughout AML sectors to avoid firms looking around for regulators with lower levels of sanctions, including fining powers.

The SRA called for a single requirement of evidence across AML managers the civil requirement, instead of the criminal one presently used by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT).

The regulator grumbled that the higher requirement of evidence incentivizes law practice to resolve their cases at the SDT where it is more likely to be reversed and typically eliminates the possibility of an early settlement which would reduce costs.

Last month the Treasury and Ministry of Justice accepted the separate suggestions of the Insurance Fraud Taskforce, which likewise included minimizing the concern of proof at the tribunal to the civil requirement. You can also report medicaid fraud cases and takes help regarding medical fraud from our lawyers.

The SRA refuted the Treasury s recommendation that a brand-new body should be developed to supervise AML managers, along the exact same lines as the Legal Services Board.

Businessman hands in handcuffs and holding ten dollar notes

The regulator alerted that this was likely to put a significant regulative burden on managers and the regulated community, the expense which was likely to be passed on to customers.

The SRA added that it did not advocate an alternative of extending the role of the LSB to consist of supervision of AML regulators, as its core function and vital strength is in driving better regulation and promoting competition instead of imposing detailed regulation.

Any extra role might rise expenses and whilst being unlikely to have a significant influence on decreasing the danger of inefficient AML regulators.

Law & Order: Child searched for guy discovered dead in Ponte Vedra Beach home

Detectives with the Major Crimes Unit of the St. Johns County Sheriff s Office are examining the death of a senior guy, found in his Ponte Vedra Beach home late Wednesday afternoon, and are trying to find his kid in connection with the death.

At an evening news conference in the Sawmill Lakes neighborhood off Palm Valley Road, Sheriff David Shoar stated authorities are trying to find 41-year-old Joseph Carmichael Reddock Jr., who need to be thought about armed and dangerous and has actually obviously made threats that he means to dedicate suicide by cop.


Deputies discovered Reddock Sr., 70, dead in his home in the 600 block of Lake Stone Circle Wednesday afternoon after a pal of his son asked for an effort to get in touch with be made.

Based on information they had and worried for his well-being, deputies required entry into the home and discovered the dad dead in a bedroom.

All indicators were that it was not a natural death and he had been the victim of violence, Shoar stated.

Authorities think he passed away at some point between Sunday and Wednesday.

Since Wednesday at press time, Reddock Jr. was believed to be taking a trip in a 1999 Silver Honda Accord with a Florida tag of 635RHY. He is referred to as a white male, 6 feet 5 inches tall, weighing about 240 pounds. He may have a shaved head and might be along with a white woman, according to the Sheriff’s Office.

The child, right now, we believe has knowledge of what took place to the daddy, Shoar stated. I would call him a suspect.

Shoar stated the Sheriff s Office has actually had contact with Reddock Jr. in the past.

2aPrison records from the Sheriff’s Office suggest he has actually been apprehended a number times, dating as far back as 2000.

Past charges consist of battery, domestic battery, battery on a police policeman and intensified attack.

Guy apprehended on sex charges.

Investigators with the Special Victims Unit arrested a St. Johns County male Tuesday afternoon on charges of obtaining a child for illegal sexual conduct using a computer and illegal use of a two-way communication gadget, the Sheriff’s Office said in a Wednesday press release.

Robert William Hayden, 40, was scheduled into the St. Johns County jail and is being held in lieu of bonds totaling $20,000.

Detectives started investigating after a parent of a 15-year-old woman called the Sheriff s Office after discovering exactly what she stated were improper text and social media posts from her daughter and the suspect recently.

Investigators think Hayden obtained the juvenile by method of SMS message in an attempt to participate in illegal sexual conduct, while understanding that she was a small, the Sheriff s Office said.

Based upon the SMS message, investigators acquired an arrest warrant for Hayden on Tuesday and he was taken into custody without occurrence.

New gov’t to defend race and religion laws at UN conference

The legislation that includes steps offering authorities the right to restrict how frequently women are allowed to deliver has actually drawn local and international condemnation for oppressing women’s rights and purposely victimizing Myanmar s Muslim population.

It was introduced in 2014 under the military-backed government of then-president U Thein Sein following pressure from hardline nationalist monks, regardless of extensive objections from women’s rights groups, some members of which reported receiving death dangers from extremists for their opposition to the laws.


A panel of worldwide professionals in Geneva will tomorrow concern a delegation of federal government representatives on whether the laws breach the convention on the elimination of all types of discrimination against women (CEDAW), to which Myanmar became celebration in 1997.

However, the new federal government has denied in a written submission to the UNs CEDAW committee that the laws break the convention.

U Soe Kyi, the director general of the Department of Social Welfare the government body tasked with supervising the reaction to the committee informed The Myanmar Times the other day that the government had no plan to rescind the laws.

MPs from the National League for Democracy had actually opposed the four laws in parliament and, according to federal government aides, together with the government and some USDP members, was successful in thinning down a few of Ma Ba Tha’s initial proposals.

The legislation has been condemned by rights groups consisting of Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch as being an attempt to curtail religious conversion and avoid Buddhist women from weding outside their faith, with critics contending that it quelches rather safeguards women s rights.

2aWorries have actually likewise been raised that the law connected to birth-spacing might be utilized to impose population control measures against the mostly stateless Muslim population in Rakhine State who self-identify as Rohingya and currently face legal attempts to suppress birth rates in some parts of the state.

Daw Aung San Suu Kyi s NLD federal government has actually come under worldwide pressure over the country’s failure to protect the group’s human rights.

Women’s rights organization’s yesterday pledged to continue to promote the legislation’s repeal.

Naw Htet Aung of the Women Organisation Network said, it doesn’t secure all the women in Myanmar and causes suffering to some women so we required they reverse the law.

Now that the brand-new federal government has responded stating that the law does protect women, we will continue working for the repeal of these laws that oppress women rights.

Concerns were likewise raised today by Amnesty International.

A declaration from the organization stated it was exceptionally concerned about the legislation and the federal government s rejection of calls to repeal the laws.

While we keep in mind the Myanmar federal government s response to the committee’s concerns, we do not believe that they sufficiently attend to issues that the laws discriminate on multiple grounds, consisting of gender, faith and marital status. Additionally, they are incompatible with Myanmar’s commitments under the Convention.

U Soe Kyi of the Department of Social Welfare stated the legislation had been enacted following a vote by the previous hluttaw and validated by U Thein Sein.

It couldn t perhaps please everybody. There will constantly be people who don t like a law, he said.

He added, if a law has to be changed or reversed that would refer the committee headed by U Shwe Mann for the evaluation of legal affairs and special problems.

2aHowever U Ko Ni, an NLD legal consultant and customer of the Myanmar Muslim Lawyers Association, stated only parliament has the power to amend the law.

He added that if the law had actually truly been aimed at securing women, it ought to have had the support of women, but most educated women had actually challenged it.

A list of issues and concerns from the CEDAW committee submitted to the federal government on November 27, 2015, highlighted concerns about the laws and asked ministers to define exactly what actions had actually been taken to guarantee they abided by the convention.


Nations that have ratified or acceded to the convention are lawfully bound to put its provisions into practice. They are likewise committed to send nationwide reports, a minimum of every 4 years, on steps they have required to abide by their treaty responsibilities.

In a reply submitted on May 3 which officials said was written in collaboration with the outgoing administration that had started work on a reaction prior to turning over power the new government protected all 4 laws.

In response to the concern raised in the list of problems in connection with the 4 laws, the laws neither forbid spiritual conversion nor interfaith marital relationship, the reply stated.

We responded to the CEDAW committee concerns [in a composed submission] after seeking advice from numerous ministries, U Soe Kyi said.

However U Kyaw Nyein, a senior lawyer with the Muslim Lawyers Network, stated the laws contravene of global standards.

It’s weird that the law entered result not because of problems by women and are aimed at one certain religious beliefs, he included.

Daw May Sabe Phyu, of the Gender Equality Network, likewise stated the laws do not represent women’s interests. The Myanmar federal government must rescind laws that oppress women s rights as the interfaith [marriage] law does. We require laws that secure women, she said.

A specific law on avoiding violence against women, which was drafted with input from women’s organizations, proceeded through parliament at a snail’s speed and was not finalized during the last federal government’s term. The questionable security of race and faith laws, backed by prominent Buddhist nationalists, were ushered through quickly by the former president.


The CEDAW committee has likewise asked the federal government to upgrade them on the development of the prevention and protection of violence versus women bill along with a list of other crucial problems affecting women in Myanmar, consisting of access to justice and procedures to remove sexual and other forms of violence in armed conflict.